A perfectly-identified neighborhood law firm faces achievable disbarment for “chilling” threats and perjury that led to a mother quickly losing custody of her boy or girl, in accordance to a advice from Tennessee’s attorney accountability board.

Nashville attorney Brian Manookian’s legislation license could be on the line based on new conclusions by the Tennessee Board of Skilled Duty.

A 48-page report filed Wednesday by a three-individual hearing panel from the board outlines what it suggests are a series of ethical violations. The Tennessean received a duplicate of the report. 

Manookian has denied wrongdoing. He argues that the incidents claimed by the panel have no bearing on his work as a attorney and do not fall under the board’s purview.

The panel’s suggestion does not suggest an rapid disbarment. Orders like this never take influence till approved by the Tennessee Supreme Courtroom following the summary of appellate critique. 

“I am assured it won’t keep up, I glimpse ahead to putting this ahead of a actual choose,” Manookian instructed The Tennessean on Sunday. “But it really is not a earn for me, for the reason that the process retains me out of the activity. The approach will take so long.”

Manookian has been at the center of several judicial challenges. He submitted complaints that led to disciplinary motion in opposition to two judges for a journey they took with disgraced previous Choose Casey Moreland, and he’s tussled with Nashville’s best prosecutor above leaks to the media.

He represented the household of a Waffle Dwelling taking pictures victim in a 2019 lawsuit against Vanderbilt College Medical Centre and the household of gentleman who sued the hospital soon after doctors mistakenly implanted a professional medical system in the mistaken kidney in 2017.

He also has represented the family of an Independence Large University pupil fatally killed by a driver whilst driving a bike in Williamson County in 2018.

But Manookian has beforehand been suspended twice after the Tennessee Board of Experienced Obligation, a panel that disciplines legal professionals, stated he experienced violated ethics procedures.

In 2018, he was suspended until getting reinstated in May 2019 immediately after suing the board in federal courtroom.

Similar:Well-identified nearby attorney ‘poses a risk of considerable hurt to the general public,’ board claims

The Tennessee Supreme Court in October 2019 once more suspended Manookian, citing evidence gathered by the board of what it termed threatening e-mail. That temporary suspension remained in outcome Sunday. 

At that time, the state’s substantial courtroom said Manookian had “improperly communicated” with an opposing lawyer’s client “by sending the customer an email built to intimidate the customer.”

‘The recorded conversation is terrifying’

In the prolonged report filed past week, the board located Manookian has continued to make threats to purchasers and many others, as well as perjured himself throughout court proceedings. 

“Regardless of numerous fees and multiple opportunities to alter directions, Mr. Manookian has exhibited a custom and pattern of threatening opposing counsel and 3rd get-togethers for no reasonably authentic intent other than to intimidate them,” the three-particular person panel located. 

Just about every of three impartial actions around his interactions with a Nashville lady would have been grounds for disbarment, the board identified. 

Manookian rented a household home from a spouse and children and left it in a issue that led the landlords’ daughter, the home supervisor, to “understandably consider” it had been deserted, the panel observed. 

Related:Properly-regarded Nashville lawyer suspended a next time, accused of violating ethics regulations

Much more:A effectively-recognized Nashville attorney sued the disciplinary panel that suspended him. Now he’s reinstated.

She went to check on the home and discovered the utilities shut off and “maggots in the refrigerator, spoiled meat in the freezer, bogs ended up stained, bathtubs have been moldy and air filters have been filthy,” in accordance to the board. The lease experienced not been compensated for months. 

She cleaned out the space and put some of the goods he experienced remaining behind in storage at her house to get it completely ready for new tenants, the report claimed. Weeks went by right before she described Manookian contacted her about his house. 

She was out of city at the time, but told him as soon as she was back, she would return his things, in accordance to the report. 

The woman had recorded a stick to-up phone from Manookian, and a transcript bundled in the report aspects the profanity-laden diatribe from the legal professional. 

“In response, Mr. Manookian countered with a bevy of major and chilling threats,” the report identified. “The panel finds that the recorded dialogue is terrifying.”

All over the time of the contact, the girl was included in a critical custody fight towards her ex-spouse and had questioned the court to suspend the man’s parenting time, in accordance to the panel’s report.

Manookian, in the phone, threatens the girl frequently, telling her “you are going to never witnessed your little one again.”

“When we get off the cell phone, you start hunting at the rear of you due to the fact the race is on,” Manookian claimed in the phone simply call, in accordance to the report. “I am gonna figure out who your father is, what healthcare facility he is in. You know what I do for a dwelling? I sue hospitals. I will figure out who your father is. I’ll determine out in which you are. … Your mom’s gonna go to jail as well. You’re never ever gonna see your child all over again.”

He remembers the conversation in a different way. 

“She broke into my dwelling and stole a range of points,” he reported Sunday. “No a single inflicted any violence, there was no try to do nearly anything extra-judiciously.” 

He submitted both equally a criminal grievance and civil lawsuit in opposition to the lady, but dropped the prices immediately after she returned his possessions, he reported. As a consequence of her interactions with Manookian, she briefly lost custody of the little one for a few months in December 2018, together with above the Christmas holiday, in accordance to the report. 

“This just isn’t an situation for a licensing board,” Manookian said. “None of that had everything to do with me staying an lawyer, It had to do with me currently being the sufferer of a criminal offense. They didn’t like it since I referred to as her and screamed at her and instructed her to convey my stuff again, which I unquestionably did.”

Manookian was subpoenaed as element of the ongoing custody negotiations, he stated. He mentioned he told the court docket at the start off of his testimony that though his memory is fallible, they ought to refer to the recording to document his statements. 

Whilst under oath, he denied when asked if he instructed the girl he would make confident she never ever noticed her boy or girl once more, contradicting the recorded responses. 

“I received 1 question completely wrong,” he explained. “That is not intentional perjury.” 

Law firm argues his opinions shielded speech

Manookian has often argued that his responses toward other lawyers and 3rd functions may be “offensive,” but they are secured speech — or at minimum not the board’s small business. 

“Mr. Manookian has hardly ever acknowledged that his conduct in this make any difference was unethical, and in actuality, he asserts that the Tennessee Supreme Court can not sanction him for his  conduct in this disciplinary motion,” the panel wrote. 

The panel’s lengthy report touches on difficulties with a situation in Williamson County and interactions with staff of Vanderbilt College Clinical Heart, but discovered the custody case to be adequate to aid their advice. 

Associated:Appeals court docket removes Tennessee decide from scenario with law firm who revealed his magic formula arrest

A lot more:Tennessee authorized watchdog out after law firm accused him of remaining an ‘anti-Muslim bigot’

The board did not reply to a request for remark remaining Friday. 

Manookian sued the Board of Professional Obligation in federal court in 2019, saying the board’s self-control broke federal regulation and violated his ideal to totally free speech. The go well with framed the suspension in part as an attempt to punish Manookian for pursuing a grievance against a Williamson County choose.

His claims in the suit were being dismissed or stayed in 2020 and Manookian’s subsequent appeal was denied as untimely, in accordance to federal court documents accessed Sunday. 

Achieve reporter Mariah Timms at mtimms@tennessean.com or 615-259-8344 and on Twitter @MariahTimms

Exit mobile version